Okay, real quick-like, here's the misery threshhold hypothesis:
People remain mostly at the same level of happiness regardless of circumstances, unless those circumstances include something that's really disastrous or otherwise misery-causing.  (Including so little money you can't afford food and warm housing, life-threatening illnesses, death and divorce, etc.)
So, in the absence of particular trauma (or above the misery threshhold, as I put it), we are basically as happy as we are ever going to be, and no lottery-winning or fabulous-babe-having or whatever will change that for more than a few months.  (Research backs me up on this.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 (Actually now with PhD, but Doctor of Philosophy just doesn't have the same evil ring, does it?)
(Actually now with PhD, but Doctor of Philosophy just doesn't have the same evil ring, does it?) 
 

3 comments:
Yeah -- I've heard about this -- and alas, it seems true. Also read, though, that happy events can temporarily raise it, but one returns to baseline in short order.
Oh wait -- duh -- yes, you already mentioned the temporary-raising part.
So that's what SamuraiChick and I expressed during our phone conversation: "I am above the misery threshhold, And you?"
From the same duo who brought you Transition-Free Conversation, because "segues are for slow people!"
(Although now that there is such a thing as a Segway, this has become an unintended double-entendre.)
Post a Comment